Spotlight

  • Political Parody: The Revolution
  • PODCAST: How Do You Know That It's True?
  • The Ron Paul Channel provides fresh, engaging original programming each week, available to subscribers live or on-demand.

Guest Appearances

  • vof guest app 1

    August 5, 2019
    12:00 p.m. Central time
    Show: The Power Hour, airing on Rense Radio Network
    Host:
     
    Daniel Brigman

    Shortwave DX: 7.490 – WWCR; 13.845 – WWCR
    Call in number: 1-844-769-2944
    Stream: www.thepowerhour.com
  • vof guest app 1

    Brent Johnson is the radio host of the longtime radio show the Voice of Freedom.

VOF Podcasts

  • vof podcast 1

    Are we creating a race of artificial humans?

    Dr. Thomas Horn is an internationally recognized lecturer, publisher, radio host and best selling author of several books including his newest, Forbidden Gates.

    read more

  • vof podcast 1

    How Do You Know that it's True?

    Brent Johnson asks the question "How do you know it's true?".

    read more

Paradox of the False Positive (MUST READ!)

on .

 

The “War on Terror” has changed the face of modern Amerika.  Today, just the possibility that we might be attacked is considered justification for the implementation of draconian, oppressive and highly restrictive regulations on the entire population.  But do all the surveillance, control, and military tactics being used to monitor the Amerikan people really make us safer from terrorists?

 

What follows is an excerpt from the book, Little Brother by Cory Doctorow.

Paradox of the False Positive


If you ever decide to do something as stupid as build an automatic terrorism detector, here’s a math lesson you need to learn first.  It’s called, “the paradox of the false positive,” and it’s a doozy.

Say you have a new disease, called Super-AIDS.  Only one in a million people gets Super-AIDS.  You develop a test for Super-AIDS that’s 99 percent accurate.  I mean, 99 percent of the time, it gives the correct result - true if the subject is infected, and false if the subject is healthy.  You give the test to a million people.

One in a million people has Super-AIDS.  One in a hundred people that you test will generate a “false positive” - the test will say he has Super-AIDS even though he doesn’t.  That’s what “99 percent accurate” means: one percent wrong.

What’s one percent of one million?  1,000,000/100 = 10,000.

One in a million people has Super-AIDS.  If you test a million random people, you’ll probably only find one case of real Super-AIDS.  But your test won’t identify one person as having Super-AIDS.  It will identify ten thousand people as having it.

Your 99 percent accurate test will perform with 99.99 percent inaccuracy.

That’s the paradox of the false positive.  When you try to find something really rare, your test’s accuracy has to match the rarity of the thing you’re looking for.  If you’re trying to point at a single pixel on your screen, a sharp pencil is a good pointer: the pencil tip is a lot smaller (more accurate) than the pixels.  But a pencil tip is no good at pointing at a single atom in your screen.  For that, you need a pointer - a test - that’s one atom wide or less at the tip.

This is the paradox of the false positive, and here’s how it applies to terrorism:

Terrorists are really rare.  In a city of twenty million like New York, there might be one or two terrorists.  Maybe ten of them at the outside.  10/20,000,000 = 0.00005 percent.  One twenty-thousandth of a percent.

That’s pretty rare all right.  Now, say you’ve got some software that can sift through all the bank records, or toll pass records, or public transit records, or phone call records in the city and catch terrorists 99 percent of the time.

In a pool of twenty million people, a 99 percent accurate test will identify two hundred thousand people as being terrorists.  But only ten of them are terrorists.  To catch ten bad guys, you have to haul in and investigate two hundred thousand innocent people.

Guess what?  Terrorism tests aren’t anywhere close to 99 percent accurate.  More like 60 percent accurate.  Even 40 percent accurate, sometimes.

What this all (means) is that the Department of Homeland Security (has) set itself up to fail badly.  They (are) trying to spot incredibly rare events - a person (who) is a terrorist - with inaccurate systems.

Is it any wonder we (are all in) such a mess?

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

Freedom
2003-2018

Freedom sm

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

Hugh Hefner

PROF. STEPHEN HAWKING
1942-2018

Hugh Hefner 

ART BELL
1945-2018

Art Bell

DWIGHT CLARK
1947-2018

dwight clark

CARL MILLER
1952-2017

Carl Miller

HARLAN ELLISON
1934-2018

Harlan Ellison

STAN LEE
1922-2018

stan lee