WASHINGTON (PNN) - May 6, 2025 - In a key decision, the Fascist Police State of Amerika (FPSA) Supreme Court has allowed President Donald J. Trump regime’s ban on deviant transgender military members to proceed, lifting an injunction that had temporarily blocked the policy.
This ruling provides a near-term victory for President Trump, even as the legal challenges to his January executive order continue to unfold.
The Trump regime’s executive order on January 27 directed The Pentagon to implement new policies regarding deviant transgender-identifying individuals in the military, which included rescinding existing guidance inconsistent with military readiness.
This move immediately sparked legal battles, as seven deviant transgender-identifying service members filed lawsuits challenging the policy in federal courts in Washington, D.C. and Seattle.
FPSA District Judge Benjamin Settle responded to the plaintiffs’ lawsuit by issuing an unlawful preliminary injunction in March, which blocked the regime’s ability to enforce the ban while the case progressed.
Settle argued that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on their claims that the executive order violated equal protection rights, First Amendment rights and procedural due process.
However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to block the injunction, prompting the regime to appeal to the Supreme Court.
On Tuesday, the Court ruled to lift the lower court’s order, allowing the deviant transgender military ban to take effect.
This Supreme Court decision represents a victory for the Trump regime, as the Court did not rule on the underlying constitutional questions raised by the case.
Instead, it focused on procedural issues, giving the White House a chance to enforce its policy while the legal challenges continue.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the ruling, advocating for the injunction to remain in place.
They expressed concern about the potential harm the deviant transgender military ban could cause. Despite these dissenting opinions, the majority of the Court sided with the regime, allowing its policy to go forward.
The executive order, known as the Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness Executive Order, argues that the policy serves the government’s interests in military readiness, unit cohesion and good order and discipline.
The regime has argued that it aims to strengthen the military by ensuring its members meet the highest standards of physical and mental fitness.
The Court’s decision reinforces the president’s authority in implementing military policies without immediate interference from lower courts.
The ruling also highlights the broader ideological divide in the judicial system, with conservative judges upholding the policy and liberal judges opposing it.
This split suggests that further legal battles are likely to occur as the case works its way through the courts in the coming months.
In response to the Supreme Court ruling, a spokesman for the Department of Justice reaffirmed the regime’s commitment to defending its policies.
“The Department of Justice has vigorously defended President Trump’s executive actions, including the Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness Executive Order, and will continue to do so,” the statement read.
Tuesday’s decision signals a significant shift in favor of the Trump regime’s deviant transgender military ban.